Commit 330a9651 authored by Mark Meredith's avatar Mark Meredith
Browse files

Fix spelling

parent 331d3032

docs/source/Inputs_Chapter.rst

+1 −1
Changes for docs/source/Inputs_Chapter.rst: 1 added line, 1 removed line.
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ keywords such as ``mfix``, ``amr``, ``geometry``, ``nodal_proj`` etc. 
.. toctree::

   :maxdepth: 1



   Units, mesh, geometry, species, fluid, DEM, regions, inital and boundary conditions <inputs/InputsProblemDefinition>

   Units, mesh, geometry, species, fluid, DEM, regions, initial and boundary conditions <inputs/InputsProblemDefinition>

   Particle drag <inputs/InputsDrag>

   inputs/InputsTimeStepping

   inputs/InputsInitialization

docs/source/eb/EBWalls.rst

+1 −1
Changes for docs/source/eb/EBWalls.rst: 1 added line, 1 removed line.
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ The :cpp:`mfix` class stores the following EB data: 


As discussed in the previous sub-section, the difference between

:cpp:`mfix::eb_levels` and :cpp:`mfix::particle_eb_levels` enables the user to

specify a modfied EB geometry for particles only. Whereas the fluid sees the EB

specify a modified EB geometry for particles only. Whereas the fluid sees the EB

geometry in :cpp:`mfix::eb_levels`. If no addition particle EB geometry is

specified (point 4 in the previous section), then

:cpp:`mfix::particle_eb_levels` points to :cpp:`mfix::eb_levels`.

docs/source/inputs/InputsDrag.rst

+1 −1
Changes for docs/source/inputs/InputsDrag.rst: 1 added line, 1 removed line.
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ With the variables defined as follows: 
     *    Mug     - gas laminar viscosity

     *    ROpg    - gas density * EP_g

     *    vrel    - magnitude of gas-solids relative velocity

     *    DPM     - particle diamater of solids phase M

     *    DPM     - particle diameter of solids phase M

     *    DPA     - average particle diameter

     *    PHIS    - solids volume fraction of solids phases

     *    fvelx   - x component of the fluid velocity at the particle position

docs/source/inputs/InputsProblemDefinition.rst

+1 −1
Changes for docs/source/inputs/InputsProblemDefinition.rst: 1 added line, 1 removed line.
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ tridimensional). We recall that, on the remaining part of the EBs, homogeneous 
Neumann boundary conditions are assumed by default.



In the following table there is a list of the possible entries for EB boundary

conditions. Each entry must be preceeded by `bc.[region0].`

conditions. Each entry must be preceded by `bc.[region0].`



+---------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------+-----------+

|                     | Description                                                           |   Type      | Default   |

docs/source/qb/granRT.rst

+2 −2
Changes for docs/source/qb/granRT.rst: 2 added lines, 2 removed lines.
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ numerical results for roughly the first half of the transien: an initially flat 
interface gives way to many fingers falling into the gas which merge and form 

a semi-stable bubble pattern. However, the simulated bubbles appear to be less

stable than those in the lab, which rise uniformily to the surface. However, in 

the simulations the center bubble rises slighlty faster than the one on the 

the simulations the center bubble rises slightly faster than the one on the 

left, which shifts more weight over the left-hand bubble, which further impedes 

its rise and eventually "squishes" the left-hand bubble into the center bubble

as it breaks the surface. Later, the right hand bubble also merges with (what
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ significantly accelerates the second half of the transient (notice the 
different times between experiment and simulation). Several different 

variations of this setup were performed: different drag laws, slower inversion 

time, different combinations of particle restitution and friction coefficients, 

inclusion of front and back walls. Although all tests were slighlty different, 

inclusion of front and back walls. Although all tests were slightly different, 

none were able to match the stability of the later time bubble pattern observed 

experimentally.