Another variation on bubbling typically observed in bubbling fluidized beds
is the detailed single-bubble study of Boyce and coworkers [BPLPM19]. In the
experiment, a cylinderical bed is brought to incipient fluidization
(just under minimum fluidization) by a uniform distributor. Then, an
additional volume of gas is abruptly injected from a nozzle located in the
center of the bed causing a single bubble to form and rise through the bed.
Measurement of the evolution of the bubble formation, rise and
is captured with high-speed, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
in a 10 mm thick slice through the center of the bed. Two particle types
are studied experimentally, only the larger of which is currently used
for qualitative benchmarking.
The experimental test section is a cylinderical bed 190 mm in diameter and
300 mm tall. The system is modeled in a domain of size 192 mm square by 384 mm
tall with a cylinderical EB geometry centered at mm.
The modeled bed height is larger than the experimentso that it can be resolved
by a uniform uniform CFD grid of power 2. Specifically, the applied grid is
, such that .
-thousand particles make up a bed of approximately
static bed height. The particles are of diameter
mm and density
kg/m3 , respectively. Mass inlet and pressure
outlet boundary conditions are specified at the bottom and top of the domain,
respectively. The nozzle is modeled with a secondary mass inlet covering the
center (in x,z) four CFD cells. We note that, as modeled, the area of the
injector is roughly three times that of the experimental nozzle, a tube of
mm diameter. The injection times are adjusted slightly to
, , , ,
and ms so that a uniform jet velocity of m/s can be
applied in all cases.
A separate defluidization simulation was first carried out first to determine
m/s using the WenYu[WY66] drag law, slightly
below the experimentally measured value of m/s. The bed
was prepared with two initialization simulations. First, the particle initial
condition is fluidized above at m/s for one second
using both the uniform distributor and jet sections. Then, the jet section is
shut off (velocity in BC set to zero) and the flow in the uniform distributor
section is reduced to incipient fluidization at m/s for an
additional two seconds. Then, beginning at s, the jet region is
set to m/s for a specified injection duration given previously.
The jet is switched on and off with a step change in usr1.f90.
Fig. 24 Comparison of experiment and MFIX-Exa simulaton for single bubbles
injected into incipiently fluidized beds for increasing (left to right)
injection times.
The figure above provides a comparison between MFIX-Exa 19.08 simulation
results and the experimental measurements. In both cases, the particle data
has been averaged onto a mm thick grid of
For the longer injection times, and
ms, the simulated bubbles are larger and more elongated than
observed experimentally. However, this trend is not universal, at shorter
injection times, the bubble is too small and actually collapses before
erupting at the surface. Above, the bubble produced from a ms
injection is currently in the process of collapsing. Another interesting
feature (perhaps most apparent at ms), is the V-shaped region
of particle down flow centered around the bubble centeroid, which appears
to be captured rather well by the simulation.